Prognosis of patients with early gastric carcinoma treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors for additional postoperative surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognosis of patients with early gastric carcinoma (EGC) treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and the risk factors for additional postoperative surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients with EGC admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to May 2019. According to different surgical methods, patients were divided into the ESD (n=60) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) groups (n=40). Clinical efficacy, perioperative indexes, incidence of complications and risk factors for additional postoperative surgery were compared. RESULTS: The ESD group had evidently prolonged operation time (P<0.01) but similar intraoperative blood loss (P>0.05) as compared with the EMR group. In comparison to the EMR group, the gastrointestinal recovery time and length of stay in the ESD group were notably shorter (P<0.01), the rates of en bloc resection and complete resection of lesions were markedly higher (P<0.05), and the postoperative fever/infection rate was noticeably lower (P<0.05). The two surgical methods had no significant difference on the overall survival rate of patients (P=0.302). It was identified that the infiltration depth and the positive surgical margin were independent risk factors for postoperative additional surgery (all P<0.05). ROC analysis revealed that positive surgical margin was quite valuable in judging the need for additional postoperative surgery. CONCLUSION: ESD can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients with EGC, and positive surgical margin is independently tied to additional postoperative surgery in patients after ESD.

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) triggers migration and invasion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells via regulation of Zeb1.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most prevalent and deadly cancers worldwide, especially in Eastern Asia. As a potential endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) can mimic estrogen, disturb the estrogen signals, and then cause various diseases. Although ESCC can be directly exposed to PFOS during food digestion, the effects and mechanisms of PFOS on the development of ESCC are still not well illustrated. This study showed that PFOS can promote the migration and invasion of ESCC cells. Further, PFOS treatment can increase the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9, while decreasing the expression of E-Cadherin (E-Cad). Zeb1, an important transcription factor for cell motility, was essential for PFOS induced migration and invasion of ESCC cells. PFOS can increase the expression of Zeb1 via upregulation of its transcription and proteins stability. A-kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) were responsible for PFOS induced transcription and proteins stability of Zeb1 in ESCC cells, respectively. Collectively, our data indicated that environmental exposure and body accumulation of PFOS might be an important risk factor for ESCC progression.

Effects of eNOS gene polymorphisms on individual susceptibility to cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) polymorphisms are implicated in cancer development remains controversial. Therefore, we performed this study to obtain a more conclusive result on associations between eNOS polymorphisms and cancer. METHODS: Literature retrieve was conducted in PubMed, Medline and Embase. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were enrolled for analyses. Pooled overall analyses showed that rs1799983 (dominant model: p = 0.01; recessive model: p = 0.007; allele model: p = 0.005), rs2070744 (recessive model: p = 0.004) and rs869109213 (recessive model: p < 0.0001; allele model: p = 0.02) polymorphisms were all significantly associated with individual susceptibility to cancer. Further subgroup analyses revealed that rs2070744 and rs869109213 polymorphisms were only significantly associated with individual susceptibility to cancer in Caucasians, whereas the rs1799983 polymorphism was significantly associated with individual susceptibility to cancer in both Caucasians and Asians. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that rs1799983, rs2070744 and rs869109213 polymorphisms may serve as genetic biomarkers of cancer in certain ethnicities.